Cheat Sheet: ‘Predictions 2024’
By popular demand, here’s a cheat sheet with 59 authors who posted predictions last year and can be expected to do so again. (Last year’s cheat sheet contained 52.)
By popular demand, here’s a cheat sheet with 59 authors who posted predictions last year and can be expected to do so again. (Last year’s cheat sheet contained 52.)
AI-minded PR pros want Tier 1 coverage. No trend is hotter, so why not? In this week’s SWMS deep-dive, we found 31 articles that could qualify as a product story or startup profile. Sounds like quite a bit of inventory.
As a product category, project management software has lasted 40 years or more. PM was never marginalized/subsumed by office suites, or forsaken by IT buyers.
In this short and sweet cheat sheet, we’ve got eight targets focused at least in part on quantum security. This is still a nascent field, though the “quantum” term has been bandied about for a decade or two.
It’s perhaps a bit surprising that our 13 “AI in healthcare” targets are more or less the usual suspects in healthcare edit. Most trades can’t afford to hire additional reporters just to cover the AI aspects of the healthcare beat.
You need to be logged in to view this content. Please Log In. Not a Member? Join Us
Here’s a dozen New York-based targets covering banking or fintech. They’re the reporters you might want to wrangle when a client is “in town” and wants to get together with a reporter for a trend-spotting session.
Here’s a list of 13 targets focused on personal finance. Remember that Insider has an entire section dedicated to the topic. We present the go-to’s in the field. Please tell us whom we missed and we will add.
This cheat sheet is highly targeted: reporters who follow the Chinese auto market. We came up with six.
Observability is hotter than the APM market ever was — AI had that effect on it. It was a no surprise to find 16 targets who follow the space closely.
YOUR ACCOUNT
FRIDGE NOTES
While the NYT pursues its suit against OpenAI, the Financial Times has chosen to license its content to help OpenAI train current and future LLMs. The NYT seems to be on the wrong side of this issue, with the Associated Press and Axel Springer also choosing to see OpenAI as a source of income, rather than an enemy.
Here’s the opposing view, from Press Gazette’s Dominic Young, who advises publishers to play a game of chicken with OpenAI and its LLM competitors.
… and it has no problem disclosing how. Reporters still run the joint, but they are getting AI assistance.
The Atlantic’s Karen Hao, in conjunction with the Pulitzer Center, is designing a course in AI for journalists. Classes begin next month. Details here. Might be something to alert your friendlies about. Karen hopes to help train 1,000 journalists in AI over the next two years.
Joshua Topolsky‘s edit project for Robinhood is optimized for mobile but you can peruse it here. The design seems crazy. Context from Axios’s Sara Fischer here.
‘The Prompt” is not out yet, but you can sign up for it here.
That’s the strategy as expressed to NYT’s Katie Robertson by Axios CEO Jim VandeHei. First up: Eleanor Hawkins, Sara Fischer and Dan Primack.